Sunday 26 June 2016

Brexit: What lessons are there for PNG and Pacific?


Image result for brexit
By Busa Jeremiah Wenogo

Europe is in shock as Britain pulled out of the European Union in what is now termed as “Brexit”[1]. The EU is a union of 28 countries formed straight after the conclusion of the 2nd World War.  

Britain is important to EU because it is its second largest economy and the world’s fifth largest economy. Thus her exit is now raising fears among European Union leaders that a domino effect could follow suit. Questions are now being asked if the EU will survive the Brexit. There are evidences on the ground indicating that “Nationalists” in various countries are now pushing for their country’s exit from the EU. Yet one could argue that this is abit premature given Britain and the EU have not yet seen the full extent of the outcome of Brexit. Already almost 3 million Britons have petition the government to revoke this decision. This looks likely to force an urgent parliament sitting to address these developments.

More importantly for UK, Britain’s decision to leave EU is already raising questions of independence for Scotland and other UK countries. Each of these UK countries are already left with a difficult task of deciding their own future – whether to stay with EU or break-away and rejoin Britain to maintain United Kingdom. So Britain’s exit could quickly lead to other important developments that could re-shape Europe’s future now and into the future.

While the pro-EU are in tears; the eurosceptics who have longed seen the union as repressive and wants their country to choose their own destiny are revering in their victory[2]. Under EU all the member countries are to comply to its laws which unfortunately may not necessarily be in the best interest of all the member states. The recent attack in Belgium and France orchestrated by the Islamic fundamentals or extremist groups however have only added to the eurosceptics’ arsenal. More and more people in Europe have demanded that their own government take a tougher stance against migration. Britain’s exit is eurosecptics’s finest hour and their call for protecting national borders is echoing through the corridors of Europe.   

The Brexit is sure to create a ripple effect across the world. Already the value of stocks on the stock markets including the Pounds has seen a significant drop. For the Pacific the result is sure to hit our shores much sooner than we expected.

PNG and the Pacific  

In 2007 EU concluded an Interim Partnership between PNG and Fiji which was ratified by the EU and PNG Parliament in 2001 and Fiji in 2014. This paved the way for its eventual implementation.

The EU is currently negotiating a comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with all fourteen countries of the region (Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu). The comprehensive agreement would cover trade in goods, trade in services, development co-operation and trade-related issues like food health and safety issues, technical barriers to trade, agriculture, sustainable development and competition[3].

The Brexit case looks certain to put a halt on this negotiation. Right now the main focus will be on forging a way forward post Brexit. Britain for its part is going to have to negotiate an exit strategy with EU in light of its decision. Given its status; the pull out of Britain in the EU no doubt will mean a substantial lessening in financial support to EU. In addition most parts of Europe are still struggling economically and may not be able to step up to fill in the void left by Britain. This could potentially mean a renegotiation of the terms of the EPA. The interim Agreement provides PNG duty free access into Britain and European Markets – right now a much needed entry into the international market. A renegotiation may well turn this around and could affect PNG’s economy – more specifically its foreign reserves[4]. This will spell disaster for PNG given its current economic condition where problems in the foreign reserves have forced the government to seek financial arrangement with other countries.  
  
EU like set-up in the Pacific?

The decision by Britain to hold a referendum to decide its future in the EU has brought to the forefront this important question of whether the Pacific could emulate a similar set-up. There is merit for such a set-up to facilitate trade and labour migration – an issue that has recently gained recognition. There is also a need to establish a common security policy to address terrorism, illegal fishing, trans-national crimes, human smuggling and protecting borders. Most Pacific Island nations have a small military to protect its borders or EEZ. For the MSG it needs a common voice to address “West Papua’s” push for independence against Indonesia. Unlike Europe the Pacific are too small and have limited resources to be able to stand up individually to negotiate trade and security issues. Through such a set-up big and powerful Pacific Island Countries like PNG can be able to support a bail-out system to bail-out economically depressed countries of the region.

Adding on this like the EU Pacific Islands under this set-up could explore the option of introducing one common currency. However, as we have seen with the Greek crisis such an option is not viable at present in the Pacific which is prone to global market shocks. 

Nevertheless, in a region where tourism and trade (both raw materials and labour) is important having a common currency will ease payments for trade and reduce transaction costs to boost tourism.   
  
In addition, scattered by the Pacific Ocean most countries of the Pacific are often prone to isolationism. This means that internally most island nations especially those of the MSG have suffered from poor governance which has often contributed to political instability. An EU like set-up will ensure that all nations conform to a unified law that will minimize such turbulence. This will further curb the emergence or rise of dictatorship as the unified parliament can over-ride the decision of a national parliament on the grounds of human rights or democracy in general.


No comments:

Post a Comment